Airway Assessment: A Critical Appraisal
نویسنده
چکیده
The ability to predict the difficult airway to preempt difficult intubation would decrease the most common damages seen in the administration of anaesthesia. Many tests have been put forth over the years, some necessitating detailed quantitative measurements like the sternomental distance, thyromental distance and inter-incisor gap but others like the upper lip bite test is of a qualitative nature which makes it easier to use and is more precise. The setback in most tests has been their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value to allow accurate prediction of the possibility of difficult intubation. Combination of the tests has not improved the various attributes to improve accuracy. The most important impediment to the continued search of a comprehensive test is the low occurrence of the difficult airway. There may be a combination of complex factors interacting in an incomprehensible manner to make the process of intubation difficult.
منابع مشابه
Anesthesiology and Emergency Medicine Personnel Attitudes towards Preoperative Airway Assessment and Its Application in North of Iran
Background and purpose: Preoperative airway assessment is of great importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes of anesthesia and emergency medicine personnel towards preoperative airway assessment and its use in hospitals located in north of Iran. Materials and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among anesthesiology personnel in the hospitals o...
متن کاملThe Impact of Implementing Critical Appraisal on EFL Teachers' Quantitative Research Literacy
This study was an attempt to scrutinize the impact of the Critical Appraisal of Published Research (CAPR) in undergraduate teacher training programs on EFL teachers’ Quantitative Research Literacy (QRL). To meet this objective, 30 male and female ELT teachers were non-randomly selected and randomly assigned to two groups. In two research classes, the experimental group received the CAPR, wherea...
متن کاملSome Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
Decisions in healthcare should be based on information obtained according to the principles of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). An increasing number of systematic reviews are published which summarize the results of prevalence studies. Interpretation of the results of these reviews should be accompanied by an appraisal of the methodological quality of the included data and studies. The critical a...
متن کاملThe Impact of Implementing Critical Appraisal on EFL Teachers’ Data Analysis Knowledge
Condemning a laissez faire approach to English Language Teaching (ELT), English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teacher trainers unanimously agree that the building blocks of teachers’ teaching framework are profoundly influenced by conducting research. Focusing on quantitative research, this study endeavored to scrutinize the impact of the Critical Appraisal of Published Research (CAPR) in undergr...
متن کاملUse of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around The Globe
Background Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were recently introduced to guide health technology assessment (HTA) agencies to improve their processes towards more legitimate decision-making. The EDP framework provides guidance that covers the HTA process, ie, contextual factors, installation of an appraisal committee, selecting health technologies and criteria, assessment, a...
متن کامل